Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Biotechnology Value Fund’ Category

Avigen Inc (NASDAQ:AVGN) has sent a letter sent to its stockholders saying that Glass Lewis, a “leading independent voting advisory service” has reviewed the Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF) proposal to remove AVGN’s board and has recommended that stockholders vote against the proposal. Glass Lewis make the recommendation on the basis that “…shareholders would be best served by allowing the current board to continue its competitive sale process and to negotiate the highest value agreement for this Company… . We also make this recommendation knowing that there are multiple parties interested in the Company and given the board’s commitment to return value to shareholders by year end 2009 in the event that no strategic agreement is negotiated.” Our two cents? While AVGN has taken steps to crystallize the value of AV411, engaging financial advisors and receiving “seven written proposals” for AVGN or AV411 (we’re not sure which), we believe that much of the credit for this should be properly laid at the feet of BVF. It’s difficult to imagine AVGN taking these steps without BVF’s presence on the share register, and we suspect that it would have been “business as usual” if BVF had not agitated so forcefully for change. We’re supporting BVF.

We’ve been following AVGN (see archived posts here) because it’s a net cash stock (i.e. it’s trading at less than the value of its cash after deducting all liabilities) and specialist biotechnology investor BVF has been pushing it to liquidate and return its cash to shareholders. MediciNova Inc (NASDAQ:MNOV) has made an offer for AVGN that we think represents a clever way for AVGN’s stockholders to receive cash equivalent to that which they would receive in a liquidation (less $7M to be paid to MNOV) with the possibility for “an extraordinary, uncapped return” if MNOV is successful post-merger. The stock is up 68% from $0.65 to close at $1.09 yesterday. We estimate AVGN’s net cash value to be $37M or $1.24 per share (BVF estimates $1.20 per share). The net cash estimate does not take into account AVGN’s AV411 assets and program, which could be worth considerably more, perhaps as much as $5M to $20M or between $0.15 or $0.60 per share.

The text of the letter is set out below:

Leading Independent Advisory Service Urges Avigen Stockholders to Reject BVF’s Proposal

Avigen’s Board Narrows Focus on Strongest Improved Bids Through Ongoing Competitive Process

Dear Shareholders,

We began building the current Board in early 2006 and have consistently followed core principals that reflect fiscal discipline and sound drug development strategies. These characteristics, along with the decisive actions taken last fall to safeguard the company’s resources, have put your Board in a position to serve the interests of all stockholders and maximize the value of your investment.

Since completing the sale of our hemophilia program for $7 million in mid-December, Avigen’s stock has appreciated 50% and we believe that the Board’s current strategy will continue to add value through an open and competitive process to evaluate potential merger transactions and a commitment to bring the strongest deal, if any, to stockholders for a vote.

Leading independent advisory service is recommending stockholders vote AGAINST BVF’s Board removal proposal

Glass Lewis is one of the nation’s leading independent voting advisory services and has reviewed the BVF Proposal to remove the current Avigen Board. As a firm that reviews many contests for control, Glass Lewis believes that an independent and knowledgeable Board is often in the best position to assess a company’s strategic alternatives for the benefit of all its stockholders. In Avigen’s situation, Glass Lewis recommends that “…shareholders would be best served by allowing the current board to continue its competitive sale process and to negotiate the highest value agreement for this Company… . We also make this recommendation knowing that there are multiple parties interested in the Company and given the board’s commitment to return value to shareholders by year end 2009 in the event that no strategic agreement is negotiated.”

The Board is listening to all stockholders and working to find a balance that reflects the range of preferences they have expressed. Avigen’s Board values all stockholders’ perspectives in defining an optimal deal structure and has encouraged BVF to consider accepting board seats or other observers rights that would allow it to participate directly in the process. This would allow the current competitive process to continue uninterrupted and without jeopardizing the most promising opportunities on the table.

Your Board now has several proposals that offer significant “downside protection” and is focusing on evaluating their upside potential

Since issuing our December 22, 2008 letter to stockholders, your Board has maintained its commitment to implement a straightforward strategy to get more value for stockholders than the company’s current cash assets. After initiating an orderly and competitive process to review strategic merger opportunities, your Board has received multiple written proposals that significantly value Avigen above its current stock price.

Your Board believes it is in the best interests of stockholders to pursue a flexible deal structure and bring the most attractive opportunity to a vote of stockholders as soon as possible. In the current environment, we believe investors are most attracted to companies with later-stage products and a lower risk profile. In the last two months we have identified several opportunities that meet these criteria. The strongest proposals received to date include most of the following:
(1) commercial or near commercial products;
(2) revenue or near-revenue generating opportunity;
(3) potential for sustainable operations without the need for equity financings;
(4) sales and marketing support from a strong commercialization partner;
(5) reduced remaining regulatory risk;
(6) attractive growth potential; and
(7) willingness to provide liquidity to Avigen stockholders who need or prefer cash.

Your Board has recently invited all bidders to provide an enhanced competitive “best” offer so that the Board and management can narrow their focus on the strongest proposals and accelerate the next stage of diligence. Several parties have improved their original offers, demonstrating unequivocally the soundness of this strategy and the likelihood that your Board’s efforts will result in greater value for stockholders.

We intend to bring to stockholders the strongest proposal. All proposals contain a significant liquidity option (i.e., “downside protection”) for stockholders that were attracted to that feature in the MediciNova proposal which was publically supported by BVF but, importantly, value Avigen above its current stock price. The Board’s focus is now on identifying which proposal best fits the criteria above and is most likely to provide the greatest upside potential for Avigen stockholders.

BVF’s public support for the MedicNova proposal overlooked the potential for improving the value through competitive negotiations

By unconditionally supporting the MediciNova proposal on December 29, 2008, and encouraging the Board to bring the proposal to “a shareholder vote as soon as practical,” BVF may have overlooked other elements of the proposal that did not fully value all of Avigen’s assets. By taking a measured approach, your Board recognized five factors that it would like to address in negotiations to enhance the value to Avigen’s stockholders:

* MediciNova is an early-stage development company that, in our opinion, is highly likely to need to raise significant additional capital in approximately the next year.

* MediciNova was trading at $1.60 per share on the day of the public statement, and yet proposed that Avigen stockholders to spend $7 million to buy MediciNova stock at $4.00 per share, taking an immediate LOSS of approximately $4.2 million.

* MediciNova proposed holding Avigen’s remaining cash for over a year, in the hopes that Avigen’s stockholders would buy more MediciNova stock at the same fixed price of $4.00 per share or 250% of its then trading price. In other words, the first $25 million in stock appreciation due from Avigen’s other assets (AV411 pain and addition program and the Genzyme milestone) would accrue to MediciNova without providing any upside benefit to Avigen’s stockholders.

* Most likely, these terms would lead to a cash payout to Avigen stockholders in June 2010 or later estimated at approximately $0.91 per share from their original Avigen holdings. During that year, Avigen’s cash would be at risk to MediciNova’s creditors if the company became insolvent, potentially leaving Avigen stockholders with much less.

* Finally, MediciNova is an extremely illiquid stock that most Avigen stockholders would find difficult to trade in the open market without significantly depressing the price, which warranted concessions. For example, during the fourth quarter of 2008, MediciNova traded less than 1,000 shares per day on 48% of the 64 trading days during the quarter and zero shares on 10 of those days.

In short, while recognizing the value of some elements of the MediciNova proposal, your Board was working first to establish an open and competitive review process in which to hold direct negotiations to evaluate and improve those terms. While respecting BVF’s enthusiasm for downside protection, we believe their aggressive early support undermined the ability of your Board to engage MediciNova in an orderly process and may have prevented MediciNova from offering its “best” proposal for all of Avigen’s assets.

Avigen’s Board urges stockholders to reject BVF’s proposal to remove the Board and avoid re-starting the competitive process or jeopardizing the strongest proposals currently under review

BVF made a shrewd investment when it recognized that Avigen’s assets were severely undervalued after the negative clinical trial results reported last October. This allowed BVF to acquire a 29% stake in Avigen at an estimated average price of approximately $0.58 per share which they understandably want to protect. Their best intentions, however, are handicapping the Board’s effort to maximize value for BVF and all stockholders and now risk losing several written proposals by recommending removal of the full Board.

Your Board has reduced expenses, preserved resources and monetized one of the company’s assets. Your Board is also increasing the upside for all stockholders through its efforts to partner or sell Avigen’s AV411 pain and addiction program and in running an open and competitive process designed to identify strategic merger opportunities that we believe ALL stockholders will find attractive.

In the end, your Board is committed to bringing the best transaction, if any, to stockholders for a vote and providing a liquidity option for stockholders that would prefer to redeem part, if not all, of their shares for cash. This process is not intended to extend beyond the fourth quarter and could progress much sooner.

Your Board would like to work with BVF to ensure that all stockholders get the very best outcome for their investment. We encourage stockholders to support this effort and vote AGAINST the BVF proposal on the WHITE proxy card today. Your Board is representing the interests of all stockholders and is in the best position to complete a value maximizing transaction.

Respectfully,

Signed for the Board of Directors
Zola Horovitz, Ph.D. as Chairman of the Board
Kenneth G. Chahine, Ph.D., J.D. as Chief Executive Officer

[Full Disclosure:  We have a holding in AVGN. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only. Do your own research before investing in any security.]

Read Full Post »

Avigen Inc (NASDAQ:AVGN) has filed two letters sent to MediciNova Inc (NASDAQ:MNOV) and intends to present the letters at the special meeting “to demonstrate the tone and character of the negotiation discussions between MediciNova and Avigen and its advisors.”

We’ve been following AVGN (see archived posts here) because it’s a net cash stock (i.e. it’s trading at less than the value of its cash after deducting all liabilities) and specialist biotechnology investor Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF) has been pushing it to liquidate and return its cash to shareholders. MediciNova Inc (NASDAQ:MNOV) has made an offer for AVGN that we think represents a clever way for AVGN’s stockholders to receive cash equivalent to that which they would receive in a liquidation (less $7M to be paid to MNOV) with the possibility for “an extraordinary, uncapped return” if MNOV is successful post-merger. The stock is up 60% from $0.65 to close at $1.04 yesterday. We estimate AVGN’s net cash value to be $37M or $1.24 per share (BVF estimates $1.20 per share). The net cash estimate does not take into account AVGN’s AV411 assets and program, which could be worth considerably more, perhaps as much as $10M to $25M or between $0.30 or $0.65 per share.

The first letter is from AVGN:

March 10, 2009

Jeff Himawan, PhD
Chairman of Board
MediciNova
435 Tasso Street
Palo Alto, CA 94301

Dear Jeff,

I write in response to Mr. Moch’s letter dated March 6, 2009, and a follow-up email to Andrew Singer on March 9, 2009.

We have still not heard back from MedicNova on its availability for either a teleconference or face-to-face meeting with the Avigen management to review MedicNova’s development plans and finances. As you know, we offered on Friday, March 6th, and then again on Monday, March 9, 2009, to have such a meeting. This is the initial step taken by all other interested parties and we continue to believe that it is an appropriate next step in our negotiations. Time is of the essence if MediciNova would like to be seriously considered as one of the final proposals we will evaluate and urge you to act accordingly.

As you know, after extensive negotiations on a confidentiality agreement between our two companies, Avigen finally agreed to MediciNova’s demand that the confidentiality agreement between our companies not contain a standstill provision at this time. This, as you know, is unlike the form of confidentiality agreement that the other interested companies have readily signed. Moreover, Avigen and MediciNova share a common asset – ibudilast (AV411 and MN-166). It appears to us that MediciNova does not consider these two facts as warranting any additional precautions for Avigen stockholders. We disagree. Avigen stockholders could be harmed if MediciNova used confidential information in a hostile offer. As a result, and as we agreed with your counsel, Avigen will not share any confidential information regarding ibudilast until we have a more robust confidentiality agreement with a standstill provision. Sharing such information could irreparably harm our stockholder’s AV411 asset by devaluing any competitive advantage that we currently hold through extensive know-how in the areas preclinical and clinical research, as well as intellectual property.

As for sharing of information, therefore, I request that we adhere to our earlier understanding that we will not to share ibudilast related information until our discussions have progressed further, we have a greater level of comfort that a deal may be consummated, and we have a more robust confidentiality agreement with a standstill provision. To that end, I request that you remove all ibudliast material from the electronic data room before we access it. As a precaution, I request that you agree to waive confidentiality on any ibudilast information inadvertently left in the electronic data room. It would also be very helpful if you could provide us with a table of contents so that we can begin to consider how best to review the material if, and when, the time is appropriate.

I urge you to consider scheduling a meeting (teleconference or face-to-face) as soon as practicable. We will make every effort to accommodate your schedule and commit our full attention.

With kind regards,

Kenneth Chahine, Ph.D., J.D.
Chief Executive Officer and President
Avigen, Inc.

cc: Dr. Yuichi Iwaki
Ken Moch

The second letter is from AVGN’s financial advisor:

Jeff Himawan, Ph.D.
Chairman of the Board
MediciNova Inc.
4350 La Jolla Village Drive
Suite 950
San Diego, CA 92122

Dear Jeff,

Thank you again for your proposal and your continued interest in Avigen.

As you are aware, for a couple of months Avigen has been diligently reviewing prospective merger candidates, including MediciNova. The interest in a merger with Avigen has been significant and we have received several written proposals. The Board of Directors of Avigen is now at a point at which it would like to advance the most promising proposals.

To that end, we are asking all interested bidders to provide their best proposal in writing this week so we can take the proposals to the Avigen Board on or about Monday, March 16.

We currently anticipate that the Board will select a subset of the proposals and authorize management to proceed with diligence with only that limited group.

As Avigen is a small company it is simply not feasible for Avigen to move forward with all interested parties at once. We intend to review the proposal that you submit this week in conjunction with all of the other proposals that we receive and “narrow the field” to the most attractive proposals.

As I am sure you can appreciate, the Board will not present to stockholders a transaction unless it is valued above the liquidation value of the company. Currently, we do not believe that MediciNova’s offer is superior to our liquidation threshold. Please keep in mind that for your proposal to be selected you not only will need to provide a proposal which is superior to liquidation, but also one which is superior to the numerous other proposals we have received and may receive in the future.

To assist parties with revising their proposals, we are providing each one with some suggestions (based on a comparison of all existing proposals as well as the Board’s desire to maximize shareholder value) on how their offer might be improved from the shareholders’ perspective.

Accordingly and per your request for detailed feedback, please allow us to provide some specifics on your proposal:

1. You have offered 1.75 million shares of MNOV stock in exchange for $7 million in Avigen cash. Based on yesterday’s closing price of $1.78 per share, those shares are only worth $3.1 million. That is a discount of $3.9 million, or over 50%. Furthermore the MNOV stock is quite illiquid. This illiquidity suggests to us that shareholders would get far less than the $3.1 million “face value” of the offered stock should they choose to sell.

2. The conversion feature in your offer is at a significant premium to the current stock price. The $4.00 per share conversion price currently represents a premium of over 100% and thus we view the Avigen shareholders’ probability of converting as very low. Given the short time frame of the convertible security (one year from close) and the high premium, the option value of the convertible security is only a few cents per Avigen share based on traditional Black-Scholes valuation methodology.

3. You place essentially no value on two of Avigen’s assets: AV411 and milestone payments that Avigen believes are likely to come due from a 2005 transaction with Genzyme. Put differently, under your proposal, because of the high conversion price of the convertible security, MediciNova stockholders prior to the transaction capture much of the future value from AV411 and Genzyme rather than existing Avigen stockholders.

4. The cash underlying the convertible security will still be at risk to a claim by creditors.

There are a number of changes that might make the MediciNova proposal competitive with the other proposals we have received and enhance its attractiveness to Avigen’s shareholders. MediciNova might consider offering:

1. a premium for cash, rather than a significant discount
2. a significantly lower conversion premium on the convertible security
3. more flexible conversion terms that might favor Avigen stockholders
4. a longer term on the convertible security to increase the option value
5. a significant value placed on the AV411 program and Genzyme milestone
6. alternative liquidity option to mitigate the illiquidity of the MNOV stock
7. other structures that do not put the Avigen stockholders’ cash at risk of a default or bankruptcy

We hope you find our feedback and suggestions helpful. We would be happy to have you as one of the parties with whom we move forward but your proposal would need to address our comments in order for us to do that. We truly hope that you will improve your offer and resubmit it by Friday, March 13 to maximize the competitiveness of your proposal with Avigen’s other alternatives. In the meantime, if you have any questions, please feel free to call me.

Sincerely,

Andrew E. Singer
Managing Director
Health Care Investment Banking

[Full Disclosure:  We have a holding in AVGN. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only. Do your own research before investing in any security.]

Read Full Post »

Avigen Inc (NASDAQ:AVGN) has filed its 10K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

We’ve been following AVGN (see archived posts here) because it’s a net cash stock (i.e. it’s trading at less than the value of its cash after deducting all liabilities) and specialist biotechnology investor Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF) has been pushing it to liquidate and return its cash to shareholders. MediciNova Inc (NASDAQ:MNOV) has made an offer for AVGN that we think represents a clever way for AVGN’s stockholders to receive cash equivalent to that which they would receive in a liquidation (less $7M to be paid to MNOV) with the possibility for “an extraordinary, uncapped return” if MNOV is successful post-merger. The stock is up 60% from $0.65 to close at $1.04 yesterday. We initially estimated AVGN’s net cash value to be around $1.22 per share (BVF estimates $1.20 per share). We’ve now increased our estimate slightly to $37M or $1.24 per share. The net cash estimate does not take into account AVGN’s AV411 assets and program, which could be worth considerably more, perhaps as much as $10M to $25M or between $0.30 or $0.65 per share.

The value proposition updated

AVGN used net cash in operating activities of $21.1m in 2008. While the cash burn rate has been reduced, it still represents a significant risk for AVGN stockholders. AVGN has attempted to reduce cash burn but expects to incur future expenses in connection with efforts to monetize the AV411 assets and evaluate merger and acquisition proposals. AVGN does expect that expenses for 2009 will be significantly below the spending levels of recent years. Our updated estimate for the company’s net cash value is set out below (the “Book Value” column shows the assets as they are carried in the financial statements, and the “Liquidating Value” column shows our estimate of the value of the assets in a liquidation):

avgn-summary-2009-1-31Off-balance sheet arrangements and Contractual obligations

AVGN does not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements. Its total contractual obligations not included in the balance sheet include $3.2M in operating leases and $1.8M in research funding for third parties.

Conclusion

At its $1.04 closing price yesterday, AVGN is trading at a 20% discount to our estimate of its net cash value of $37M or $1.24 per share. The liquidation value could be considerably higher again, as we have not included in the estimate the potential value of the AV411 assets and program, which could be worth an additional $10M to $25M or between $0.30 or $0.65 per share. BVF has made considerable head way, and we believe they have a good chance of securing the AVGN board seats they seek. The stock is up considerably since we initiated the position, but has not yet reached our estimate of value, and so we are maintaining our position.

[Full Disclosure: We have a holding in AVGN. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only.]

Read Full Post »

OrthoLogic Corporation (NASDAQ:CAPS) has filed its 10K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

We’ve been following CAPS (see our post archive here) because it trades below its net cash value and Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF) has disclosed a 13.42% holding. It’s an unusual holding for us because BVF’s holding is passive. At CAPS’s $0.51 close Friday it has a market capitalization of $20.8M. Our initial estimate for CAPS’s net cash value was $44.1M or $1.08 per share. We’ve now adjusted that valuation to $43.8M or $1.07 per share. CAPS’s cash burn rate is quite high relative to its net cash position, so rapid steps need to be taken for this to be a profitable investment.

The value proposition updated

The summary of our estimate for the company’s liquidation value is set out below (the “Book Value” column shows the assets as they are carried in the financial statements, and the “Liquidating Value” column shows our estimate of the value of the assets in a liquidation):

caps-summary-2009-1-31

Off-balance sheet arrangements and Contractual obligations

There is no discussion in the 10K about CAPS’s off-balance sheet arrangements. CAPS’s only contractual obligation disclosed in 10K is for the company’s Tempe, Arizona facility and is $1.3M through 2012.

Conclusion

At its $0.51 close Friday, CAPS is trading at 47% of our estimate of its $1.07 per share net cash value. The risk for this investment continues to be that CAPS dissipates its cash before it or BVF can salvage any value. Management is taking steps to reduce its cash burn and repurchase undervalued stock, which is encouraging.

[Full Disclosure:  We do not have a holding in CAPS. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only. Do your own research before investing in any security.]

Read Full Post »

Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF) has filed the slides to its presentation to the stockholders of Avigen Inc (Nasdaq: AVGN) to remove the existing directors at the special meeting to be held March 27, 2009.

The slides can be viewed here.

We’ve been following AVGN (see archived posts here) because it’s a net cash stock (i.e. it’s trading at less than the value of its cash after deducting all liabilities) and specialist biotechnology activist fund BVF has been pushing it to liquidate and return its cash to shareholders. MediciNova Inc (NASDAQ:MNOV) has made an offer for AVGN that we think represents a clever way for AVGN’s stockholders to receive cash equivalent to that which they would receive in a liquidation (less $7M to be paid to MNOV) with the possibility for “an extraordinary, uncapped return” if MNOV is successful post-merger. The stock is up 68% from $0.65 to close at $1.09 on Friday. We are maintaining our position because we estimate AVGN’s liquidation value to be around 12% higher at $1.22 per share (BVF estimates $1.20 per share).

BVF has also issued the following press release:

BIOTECHNOLOGY VALUE FUND CONFIRMS NOMINEES’ PLANS IF ELECTED TO THE AVIGEN BOARD AT SPECIAL MEETING

Urges Stockholders to Vote to Remove Current Board and Elect its Slate of Four Stockholder-Oriented Independent Nominees

Biotechnology Value Fund, L.P. (“BVF”), today confirmed its plans for the future of Avigen, Inc. (Nasdaq: AVGN) if stockholders remove the current members of the Avigen Board and replace them with BVF’s four new, stockholder-oriented, independent director nominees at the Special Meeting of stockholders to be held on March 27, 2009. BVF, the beneficial owner of approximately 30% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, has called the Special Meeting to give stockholders the opportunity to protect what remains of Avigen’s assets, which it believes are in danger of being completely wasted by the Board. Upon the removal of the current Board and election of BVF’s nominees, subject to the nominees’ fiduciary duties, BVF pledges the following:

· First, all stockholders who desire liquidity will have the immediate ability to cash out of their investment in Avigen and receive a payment of $1.00 per share by tendering their shares into the BVF tender. Stockholders who do not wish to sell their shares will have the opportunity to participate with BVF in the future of Avigen;

· Next, the nominees will immediately announce that Avigen will only consider and proceed with strategic transactions that guarantee a quantified worst-case outcome of approximately Avigen’s liquidation value;

· Next, the nominees will then commence negotiations with MediciNova, with the goal of reaching an agreement on the best terms possible for all Avigen stockholders;

· Next, the nominees will consider any other transactions that satisfied the downside protection requirements described above; and

· Ultimately, the nominees will present any transaction that satisfies the downside protection requirements described above and that the nominees believe is in the best interests of stockholders to stockholders for their approval.

Should the nominees be unable to negotiate final terms with a third party that satisfies the requirements described above, or should such transaction not be approved by stockholders, the nominees intend to promptly return the Company’s remaining cash to stockholders.

Mark N. Lampert BVF Partner stated, “In addition to confirming our plan for the future of the Company, we also wanted to clarify a few remaining issues for stockholders. Specifically, neither BVF nor its nominees have any financial interest or other stake in MediciNova or its proposed transaction. Our only concern is for the fair valuation and prevention of lost value of Avigen. Our interest in Avigen is solely as stockholders – we have never sought, nor would we accept, any benefit solely for ourselves. In addition, in the event they are elected to the Board, our nominees will not receive any compensation for their services as directors of Avigen, other than Mr. Coppedge who stands to receive only nominal director fees. We encourage stockholders to act now to protect their investment by voting the GOLD proxy card today.”

[Full Disclosure: We have a holding in AVGN. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only.]

Read Full Post »

Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF) yesterday filed additional material in the proxy solicitation to remove the existing directors of Avigen Inc (Nasdaq: AVGN) at the special meeting to be held March 27, 2009. BVF is urging stockholders to remove the current members of the AVGN and replace them with BVF’s four “new, stockholder-oriented, independent director nominees.” BVF has called the special meeting “to give stockholders the opportunity to protect what remains of [AVGN]’s assets, which it believes are in danger of being completely wasted by the Board.”

We’ve been following AVGN (see archived posts here) because it’s a net cash stock (i.e. it’s trading at less than the value of its cash after deducting all liabilities) and specialist biotechnology activist fund BVF has been pushing it to liquidate and return its cash to shareholders. MediciNova Inc (NASDAQ:MNOV) has made an offer for AVGN that we think represents a clever way for AVGN’s stockholders to receive cash equivalent to that which they would receive in a liquidation (less $7M to be paid to MNOV) with the possibility for “an extraordinary, uncapped return” if MNOV is successful post-merger. We estimate AVGN’s cash at around $1.22 per share (BVF estimates $1.20 per share), which is around 16% higher than AVGN’s $1.05 close yesterday.

BVF’s press release is set out below:

BIOTECHNOLOGY VALUE FUND, L.P.

March 12, 2009

VOTE THE ENCLOSED GOLD PROXY CARD TO HELP UNLOCK VALUE AT AVIGEN, INC.

ELECT DIRECTORS WHO ARE DEDICATED TO MAXIMIZING VALUE FOR ALL AVIGEN STOCKHOLDERS BY REDUCING CORPORATE WASTE AND PROTECTING STOCKHOLDERS’ DOWNSIDE RISK WHILE MAINTAINING SIGNIFICANT UPSIDE POTENTIAL

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

We, the Biotechnology Value Fund (“BVF”), are the owners of 8,819,600 shares, or approximately 30% of Avigen’s outstanding common stock. Since we took the lead in protecting value for all stockholders of Avigen in October of 2008, the stock price has increased by over 65%. We have successfully caused the Avigen management team and Board to reduce expenses and sell off programs that they do not have the necessary expertise to develop. We now need your participation to secure Avigen’s substantial remaining value by removing the members of the current self-serving Board and electing our independent nominees who are committed to protecting value for all stockholders.

Let me state from the outset that we neither seek, nor would we accept, any consideration or benefit solely for ourselves. Avigen has falsely accused us of this numerous times, even though we have been crystal clear on this fundamental issue all along. We are waging this effort because (a) we feel a sense of responsibility to do so on behalf of all stockholders given our unique position as the largest stockholder and (b) we believe it is the right thing to do, especially in the context of the current economic environment caused, in part, by similar self-serving managements and Boards.

Throughout this process we have sought only three simple things:

1. that Avigen stop recklessly wasting stockholder money;

2. that stockholders be empowered to decide the fate of Avigen’s remaining cash; and

3. that stockholders be guaranteed a quantified worst-case outcome of approximately Avigen’s liquidation value.

Thus far we have made progress with #1 and #2 above. Facing pressure from BVF, Avigen has abandoned, at least temporarily, its plan to spend money on its remaining products. In addition, the Company has now been forced to call a special meeting to finally permit stockholders the opportunity to weigh in. Prior to our intervention, Avigen’s stock traded at a mere 33% of the cash in the bank and at a steep discount to its current price. This is a remarkable reflection on how poorly Avigen was and is viewed by the investment community. Prior to our intervention, Avigen’s plan was to spend all stockholder money over two years on uncompelling products that it has subsequently conceded were not worthy of investment.

It is worth reflecting on some of Avigen’s historical “accomplishments”:

1. Avigen has consumed over $250 million of investor capital, with little value to show for it. Why should they be entrusted with the last $50 million?

2. Avigen selected a Chief Executive Officer who lives in Park City, Utah when the Company is based in California.

3. Avigen has committed to pay significant fees in the form of golden parachutes to its senior executives and multiple investment bankers, lawyers and consultants in an amount that, we believe, could exceed $5 million under certain circumstances.

4. Despite purporting to have reduced their use of cash and working to protect stockholders, we believe Avigen will spend nearly $20 million, or over $0.65 per share, between the time they announced the failure of AV650 and when they supposedly hope to complete a merger.

5. Avigen adopted a “poison pill,” which we believe is just another example of the Board acting first to protect their jobs rather than the stockholders they have a fiduciary duty to represent.

6. Avigen delayed calling the special meeting for approximately two months before setting a rushed meeting date that we believe was set to prevent stockholders from having adequate opportunity to receive and review proxy materials and vote at the special meeting.

We have grown increasingly dismayed that Avigen’s Board and management team, who collectively own little stock, have wasted money on golden parachutes, multiple investment bankers, consultants and lawyers. Had Avigen merely agreed to guarantee a worst case scenario for stockholders, this fight would not have transpired. Thus, we can only conclude that Avigen is likely to gamble stockholders’ remaining capital that, precedent warns, could result in a near total destruction of stockholder value.

We are frankly surprised that the Board has not previously addressed our concerns by affirmatively and unequivocally agreeing to proceed only with a transaction that provides for stockholders to receive no less than the Company’s approximate liquidation value. In fact, it appears to us that the Board is only now even mentioning an undefined intent to provide some merger liquidity in response to our demand for full downside protection for all stockholders. We believe that Avigen’s shares are undervalued by the market as a result of stockholders’ concern about the direction the current Board is taking the Company. New leadership is needed to prevent further erosion of each stockholder’s investment in Avigen, as well as to take advantage of opportunities that exist to maximize stockholder value.

WITHOUT ANY EVIDENT RATIONAL MOTIVE, AVIGEN HAS NOT AGGRESSIVELY PURSUED THE COMPELLING MERGER PROPOSAL BY MEDICINOVA THAT OFFERED BOTH DOWNSIDE PROTECTION AND SIGNIFICANT UPSIDE TO ALL AVIGEN STOCKHOLDERS

Unlike the current Board, we believe that a merger with MediciNova makes sense for all Avigen stockholders and we cannot understand why only lip service was paid to pursue a deal with MediciNova. Among the extraordinary potential benefits we see in a merger with MediciNova are:

Downside Protection: Based on our analysis, even if a merger with MediciNova is unsuccessful, Avigen stockholders would still receive the approximate current liquidation value of Avigen. This means that, even in the worst-case scenario, the merger would yield an approximate 65% premium to Avigen’s stock price before we submitted our request to the Company to call the special meeting.

Tremendous Upside Potential: Based on our analysis, if a merger with MediciNova is successful, Avigen stockholders could own a substantial percentage of MediciNova (approximately 45% of the combined company). We believe the Board has not had any substantive discussions with MediciNova. We do not understand why they have dismissed the offer as providing little value.

• Free Option: Under the terms of the proposed merger, stockholders would have at least one year after the merger is consummated to choose whether they want downside protection or upside potential, as described above. We believe this free option period offers stockholders tremendous upside potential with low risk.

Neither BVF nor its nominees have any financial interests in MediciNova. BVF is only interested in the superior transaction for ALL stockholders. We simply believe that in light of similar historical transactions, it is important that stockholders have downside protection. If BVF’s nominees are elected to the Board, stockholders can either tender their shares in the BVF tender, or not tender and participate with BVF in the future of Avigen, whether through a merger with MediciNova, subject to the nominees’ fiduciary obligations, or if the merger is not feasible, to consider liquidation or other similar type transactions. In any case all stockholders will get to choose and have the opportunity to get immediate cash back. The nominees intend to present any potential MediciNova transaction to stockholders for approval – ensuring that stockholders will get a true say in the future of Avigen.

We believe the Board’s failure to commit exclusively to a transaction that offers downside protection based on the Company’s liquidation value suggests that the Board is considering other options, which will put the value of Avigen at risk. As the Company’s largest stockholder, we share the interest of all stockholders in protecting and preserving our investment. Unlike the directors and management, BVF only profits if the stock price goes up and shares the interest of all stockholders to increase share value and limit share loss. We receive no other payments or compensation.

THE VAST MAJORITY OF FAILED BIOTECHNOLOGY COMPANIES THAT HAVE FOUND THEMSELVES IN AVIGEN’S CURRENT SITUATION HAVE MANAGED TO DESTROY BETWEEN 80%-99% OF STOCKHOLDER VALUE FROM THEIR THEN LIQUIDATION VALUE

We are concerned that Avigen will enter into a transaction without downside protection that would end up destroying value. We have good reason to fear this, because most recent mergers involving companies similarly situated to Avigen (e.g., Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Anesiva, Inc., ARCA biopharma, Inc., Evotec Aktiengesellschaft, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. and others), managed to destroy stockholder value. In each of these transactions, the stock prices declined over 80% from their liquidation value following the Board’s decision to pursue a transaction, resulting in aggregate lost value in excess of $200 million. Of course the management, directors, and bankers took their millions of dollars of fees in cash rather than stock in the companies they supposedly supported. The directors and management of companies like Avigen deserve recognition: it is quite a feat to destroy 80% of the liquidation value of a company possessing little else but cash! The charts below illustrate these astonishing failures.

bvf-charts-1-and-21bvf-charts-3-4-and-5* Approximate net cash per share liquidation value at time of negative binary event.

This repeated lost value and waste is a key reason why we believe downside protection is so important for all stockholders. We want to prevent Avigen from joining this long and infamous list of failures. This is a key reason why we believe the MediciNova transaction is so attractive.

WE BELIEVE THE AVIGEN BOARD IS ENTRENCHING ITSELF AS IT PREPARES TO ENTER INTO AN EGREGIOUS TRANSACTION THAT COULD BURN THROUGH OUR COMPANY’S REMAINING CASH

In a shameless example of protecting their own self-interest, in October 2008 Avigen increased its golden parachute payments, allegedly to attract and retain executive talent. Our first question is: which executive employees does Avigen need to retain when, in our view, Avigen does not possess a viable business? We have estimated that the golden parachute payouts total at least $2 million. Payments to consultants, bankers and lawyers are quickly adding up as well. Given the current economic conditions, we find it irresponsible for Avigen to engage in such behavior that amounts to a slap in the face of all Avigen stockholders. The recent addition of a poison pill by the Board adds further insult to stockholders who have already been insulted by a Board that ignores their pleas.

We are afraid that if the current Board remains in place, they will burn through Avigen’s remaining cash by engaging in a transaction that will further destroy stockholder value. For example, any transaction proposed by Avigen is likely to have a substantial and non-refundable breakup fee that will not be returned to stockholders even if a transaction is not approved. Everyday that the current Board remains in place, the cash per share is dwindling.

AFTER DELAYING THE SPECIAL MEETING FOR MONTHS, THE BOARD FINALLY SET AN ACCELERATED MEETING DATE TO TRY AND PREVENT STOCKHOLDERS FROM HAVING AN OPPORTUNITY TO LET THEIR VOICE BE HEARD

The Board has now set March 27, 2009 as the date for the special meeting of stockholders. We delivered our notice to the board demanding that a special meeting be called approximately two months ago. Finally, after nearly two months of delay and significant and unnecessary corporate waste, the Company announced a March 27, 2009 meeting date, which will occur in just over two weeks, barely enough time to deliver our proxy materials to you. At this critical meeting, Avigen stockholders will be given the opportunity to remove the entire Board and elect independent directors who will strive to preserve and enhance value for all Avigen stockholders. We hope that you will support us by immediately voting the enclosed GOLD proxy card. If you Share our Concern for the Future of Our Company, Do Not Delay, Vote Your Gold Proxy Card Today.

TIME IS SHORT

Act Now to Protect Your Investment By Voting The Enclosed Gold Proxy Card Today

Unfortunately, we have come to the conclusion that the current Board is not fit to run our Company and that it will continue to destroy stockholder value if it is not replaced. Please join our campaign to maximize stockholder value by voting the enclosed GOLD proxy card today.

If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your GOLD proxy card, please contact our proxy solicitors, MacKenzie Partners, Inc., Toll-Free at 1-800-322-2885 or 1-212-929-5500 (call collect) or by email at proxy@mackenziepartners.com. We look forward to speaking to many of you during the course of this campaign and hope that we can count on your support.

Sincerely,

/s/ Mark N. Lampert
Mark N. Lampert
Biotechnology Value Fund, L.P.

[Full Disclosure: We have a holding in AVGN. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only.]

Read Full Post »

Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF) yesterday filed an amended proxy statement in its effort to remove all of the existing directors of Avigen Inc (Nasdaq: AVGN).

We’ve been following AVGN (see archived posts here) because it’s a net cash stock (i.e. it’s trading at less than the value of its cash after deducting all liabilities) and specialist biotechnology activist fund BVF has been pushing it to liquidate and return its cash to shareholders. MediciNova Inc (NASDAQ:MNOV) has made an offer for AVGN that we think represents a clever way for AVGN’s stockholders to receive cash equivalent to that which they would receive in a liquidation (less $7M to be paid to MNOV) with the possibility for “an extraordinary, uncapped return” if MNOV is successful post-merger. We estimate AVGN’s cash at around $1.22 per share (BVF estimates $1.20 per share), which is around 20% higher than AVGN’s $1.02 close yesterday.

The Background to Solicitation portion of the amended proxy statement sets out a potted history of the situation to date:

The members of the BVF Group are currently the beneficial owners of an aggregate of 8,819,600 Shares, representing approximately 29.63% of the issued and outstanding common stock. As significant stockholders of Avigen, we have one goal: to maximize the value and minimize the risk on behalf of all stockholders. A brief synopsis of Avigen corporate history as well as our recent efforts to maximize stockholder value is summarized in the following chronology of events leading up to this proxy solicitation:

We first became a shareholder of Avigen in 2005, the year Avigen sold, for $12 million, its unsuccessful gene therapy business in which the Company had invested over $150 million. The Company, led by its current CEO, Ken Chahine, spent nearly two years running a “process” with the mandate to re-invent the Company by investing in whatever the current management team deemed compelling. In January 2006, this management team chose to acquire its lead development candidate, AV650, because, in their own words, “we believe it is a low risk.” In fact the Company’s entire strategy, then and now, is supposedly “designed to mitigate the risk of bringing innovative therapies to U.S. patients.” $100 million later, on October 21, 2008, Avigen announced the outright failure of its “low risk” bet on AV650, resulting in a collapse in the Company’s stock price. This same management team and Board, which has failed previously, now wishes to bet the substantial remaining stockholder capital on whatever it deems appropriate.

We recently acquired a significant number of Shares and became the largest stockholder of Avigen. We increased our investment in October 2008 based upon our belief that Avigen’s shares were significantly undervalued. In fact, Avigen reported $56 million, or $1.88 per Share, of financial assets as of September 30, 2008, consisting of cash, cash equivalents, available-for-sale securities and restricted investments, while trading at a price well below $1.00 during the two months prior to filing this proxy statement. We believe this depressed trading price, substantially below Avigen’s cash liquidation value, is based upon the market’s concern that management and the existing Board will pursue ill-advised or other value destroying ventures, at stockholders’ expense, while compensating themselves in the process.

Since this time, we have reached out to the Board numerous times, each time raising our concern that Avigen’s existing liquid assets not be wasted or otherwise committed to value destroying ventures.

We have specifically suggested that the Board “guaranty” the worst case outcome for all stockholders. This guaranty could be accomplished in several ways, including by dividending or distributing all excess cash to stockholders at the present time, or by offering to buy back any and all Shares from stockholders that wish to sell at a specific price at a specific future date. At no time have we asked for – nor would we accept – any consideration or benefit for ourselves that would not be offered to all stockholders.

The Board has ignored our attempts to work constructively for the benefit of all stockholders. Avigen responded to our offers by unilaterally increasing and broadening management’s “golden parachute” severance agreements and unilaterally adopting a “poison pill,” raising our concerns about this Board’s and management’s true intentions.

The Board’s “golden parachute” severance agreements with management, approved under the ridiculous justification that such payouts are necessary to “attract and retain key employees,” are particularly outrageous given Avigen’s current circumstances. Our analysis indicates that these payouts, which we believe would be triggered by most “change in control” scenarios, including a liquidation, total at least $2 million, a significant amount of the Company’s entire market value at the time of adoption. The recipients of these golden parachute arrangements include Avigen’s CEO, Ken Chahine, who resides in Park City, Utah, even though the Company is based in California. We question how the Company can justify such actions as necessary to “attract and retain key employees” when Avigen has no real business at this time. These hastily adopted severance arrangements need to be challenged and, if possible, revoked.

In addition, we believe the Board’s implementation of the stockholder rights plan, or “poison pill,” serves no purpose other than to entrench the Board and keep the BVF Group from purchasing additional stock in the Company. We are concerned that management and the Board are more concerned with retaining their jobs and compensation than with maximizing stockholder value. As evidence, Avigen’s stock price fell more than 20% after the adoption of the poison pill. The pill should be redeemed. The Board’s recent actions reveal its true self-interest and leave us concerned that the Board will indeed destroy and/or take all remaining value. Please see “Proposal No. 1 – Reasons for Removing Existing Directors – We believe the unilateral action by the Board to adopt a “poison pill” is an attempt by the Board and management to ensure the retention of their jobs and their compensation” for further discussion of Avigen’s recently adopted stockholder rights plan.

On December 22, 2008, MediciNova, Inc. (“MediciNova”), a company in which we have no economic interest, proposed to merge with Avigen with an innovative and, we believe, compelling downside-protected structure. We believe the proposed merger is uncontrovertibly in the best interest of all stockholders and we had grave concerns that the Board may not negotiate in good faith with MediciNova, if at all. Avigen’s statements apparently rejecting this proposal confirmed our worst fears. We are concerned that the Board’s and management’s self-interest will prevent them from acting in what we believe to clearly be the best interests of all stockholders.

Accordingly, after much consideration we felt compelled to call the Special Meeting to remove the existing directors and to elect new, truly independent directors who, if elected, plan to take actions to benefit all stockholders, including redeeming Avigen’s stockholder rights plan, working to consummate the proposed transaction with MediciNova and/or working to complete a distribution of Avigen’s assets to all stockholders.

Additionally, on January 23, 2009, we commenced a cash tender offer to purchase any and all of the outstanding Shares that we do not own at a price of $1.00 per Share (the “Offer”). The offer price represents a 35% premium over Avigen’s closing stock price of $0.74 on January 8, 2009, the date prior to the date of our announcement that we were seeking to remove all incumbent members of the Board. The Offer was extended on February 20, 2009 and on March 5, 2009 and is currently scheduled to expire at 6:00 p.m., New York City time, on Friday, April 3, 2009, unless it is further extended.

The Offer is conditioned upon, among other things, (i) the Nominees being elected to the Board at the Special Meeting or otherwise being appointed to, and constituting a majority of, the members of the Board, (ii) the Board redeeming the “poison pill,” or our being satisfied in our reasonable discretion that the “poison pill” is otherwise inapplicable to the Offer, the BVF Group or any affiliates or associates of the BVF Group, and (iii) Avigen not having authorized, recommended, proposed, announced its intent to enter into or entered into an agreement with respect to or effected any merger, consolidation, liquidation, dissolution, business combination, acquisition of assets, disposition of assets, alternative strategy or relinquishment of any material contract or other right of Avigen or any comparable event or capital depleting transaction not in the ordinary course of business. The Offer is not subject to any financing condition.

Assuming the conditions to this Offer are satisfied, stockholders would have the choice of (i) tendering their Shares and receiving a fixed cash payment upon the closing of the Offer at a premium to the market price on the day prior to both the announcement of the Offer and the announcement we were seeking to remove the incumbent members of the Board and to elect the Nominees, or (ii) maintaining their investment in the Company and participating in the proposed merger with MediciNova, if it occurs. Regardless of whether or not a stockholder intends to tender their Shares in the Offer, we strongly recommend that all stockholders vote to elect each of the Nominees and in favor of the other proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement.

We encourage you to review the remainder of this Proxy Statement, which describes in greater detail our concerns and the proposals contained herein.

[Full Disclosure: We have a holding in AVGN. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only.]

Read Full Post »

Avigen Inc (Nasdaq: AVGN) yesterday mailed a letter to stockholders calling on them to reject the proposal to remove AVGN’s board being presented to stockholders by Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF).

We’ve been following AVGN (see archived posts here) because it’s a net cash stock (i.e. it’s trading at less than the value of its cash after deducting all liabilities) and specialist biotechnology activist fund BVF has been pushing it to liquidate and return its cash to shareholders. MediciNova Inc (NASDAQ:MNOV) has made an offer for AVGN that we think represents a clever way for AVGN’s stockholders to receive cash equivalent to that which they would receive in a liquidation (less $7M to be paid to MNOV) with the possibility for “an extraordinary, uncapped return” if MNOV is successful post-merger. We estimate AVGN’s cash at around $1.22 per share (BVF estimates $1.20 per share), which is around 20% higher than AVGN’s $1.02 close yesterday.

The text of AVGN’s letter to stockholders is set out below:

To our stockholders:

We urge you to support your Board of Directors at the upcoming Special Meeting of Avigen Stockholders on March 27, 2009 – by rejecting the proposal to remove your Board of Directors that is being presented to stockholders by Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF).

The Avigen Board is committed to enhancing the value of your investment and has acted consistently and responsibly to protect the company’s value and represent your best interest.

In contrast, BVF, an activist investor, seeks to take direct control of the company with nominees that have conflicts of interest (all but one is a BVF manager or partner), have no insight into the value of Avigen’s assets, have not been forthcoming with other stockholders about their dealings, and have a record of acting in ways that are NOT in the best interests of other stockholders.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST the proposal to remove the current Board, using the enclosed WHITE proxy card. This will enable the Board to continue working to maximize Avigen’s value.

AVIGEN’S BOARD HAS WORKED HARD TO EARN YOUR TRUST

Avigen’s Board is executing a plan to maximize the value of your investment. Your vote will allow the Board to complete these efforts:

Our Pledge To Stockholders

Avigen’s Board is committed to protecting your rights and intends to:

1) Continue efforts to capture the financial value of our AV411 pain and addiction program;

2) Present the best merger transaction, if any, for a vote of stockholders;

3) Provide stockholders who have a preference for liquidity in a transaction, the ability to redeem part, if not all, of their shares for cash;

4) Continue to update stockholders on our progress; and

5) Conclude the process in a timely manner – no later than the end of 2009.

1) We’ve preserved cash and protected Avigen stockholders’ upside.

We expect to have cash of more than $40 million at the end of 2009, in part because of the conservative actions we took last year, including cutting headcount by 70% and selling an early-stage program for $7 million in cash. Even before the disappointing clinical trial results last October, we worked hard to maintain a strong and clean balance sheet and to hold the line on expenses. Importantly, in each of the last five years, your Board has met or exceeded its year-end cash projections and we intend to do the same in 2009.

2) We’re conducting a competitive process so stockholders get the most value out of Avigen’s current assets.

Your Board is leading an orderly process to maximize value for the assets of the company and is committed to taking steps to ensure we deliver the best opportunities for stockholders.

Your current Board and management have the necessary know-how to sell or partner our pain and addiction program for its highest value to stockholders. AV411 is a promising therapy that is in government-funded human testing. We are currently in negotiations with multiple interested parties.

3) The Board’s strategic review process is paying off: we have received seven written proposals to date.

Seven companies have made written offers to Avigen. Now, we are carefully negotiating with interested parties. Because this is a competitive process, each of the companies knows they must present their best offer. We are making steady progress in our negotiations and expect to complete the process in the coming months.

4) We intend to give stockholders with a need or preference for liquidity in a transaction an option to redeem at least part, if not all, of their shares for cash

We believe BVF’s need for liquidity greatly outweighs its interest in evaluating opportunities that could lead to increased value for other stockholders. With your best interest in mind, we intend to provide an opportunity for any stockholder to opt-out and redeem at least part, if not all, of their shares for cash in any transaction. We believe this will provide BVF an opportunity to sell part or all of its position and not impose its own agenda on other stockholders.

5) We’re prepared to cash out stockholders if we can’t find a better option.

We recognize that despite our best intentions and efforts, it may not be possible to identify a favorable merger transaction. Therefore, if at any point during this process, your Board of Directors determines that a favorable transaction is unlikely, the Board will continue to consider all other strategic options, including a partial or complete distribution of Avigen’s cash. In any event, we intend to complete the process, including monetizing our pain and addiction program, no later than the end of 2009.

BVF DOES NOT REPRESENT YOUR INTEREST

BVF is trying to seize complete control of your Board and has acted in ways that are not in the best interests of other stockholders.

1) BVF’s interests are different from other stockholders’ interests

Why does BVF oppose the Board’s competitive process – a process that aims to maximize value for all stockholders? We believe it’s because BVF’s interests are different from the interests of all other stockholders.

BVF cannot easily sell its almost 9 million shares of Avigen without causing the stock price to fall. It could avoid this risk, however, if it can force Avigen into any transaction that cashes BVF out of the stock – even if that means accepting a significant discount to our book value and a significantly lower price for you.

In fact, BVF has opposed all plans that don’t fit its self-serving agenda – even when this has meant destroying value for other Avigen stockholders.

2) BVF favors immediate acceptance of the initial acquisition proposal from MediciNova – despite the low initial proposed value per share – apparently without negotiations to improve the terms

BVF immediately supported the initial acquisition proposal by MediciNova without encouraging negotiation to improve the terms. That proposal is estimated to result in potential cash for Avigen stockholders of approximately $0.91 per share1 after being sequestered and unavailable to Avigen stockholders until at least June 2010. The other components of the transaction provide little value. Your Board believes it can deliver more value for your investment through negotiations with MediciNova or through other competitive proposals.

____________________
1 This estimate is based on our good faith assumptions of Avigen’s cash at the close of the transaction and estimated transaction costs.

3) BVF has not been forthcoming with stockholders

The CEO of MediciNova told Avigen’s management that MediciNova was working with BVF in making its acquisition proposal to Avigen. BVF has not disclosed this working relationship with MediciNova to stockholders.

4) BVF activities have hurt other Avigen stockholders

In the face of BVF’s public support for the MediciNova acquisition and its attacks on Avigen’s Board, several potential bidders who have not submitted a written proposal for Avigen’s assets have been reluctant to negotiate with Avigen until BVF’s threats are resolved. One important would-be buyer said they don’t want to spend the time and money in making a proposal that BVF is going to reject out of hand.

Finally, we learned from three separate parties that a BVF manager – and one of BVF’s nominees for the Avigen Board – tried to sabotage Avigen’s confidential discussions with a potential bidder. The BVF nominee contacted Board members of a potential bidder and warned them that BVF would withhold its support for their potential deal with Avigen. These actions undermine the best interest of other stockholders.

In short, BVF’s actions have consistently harmed the interests of other Avigen stockholders. The Board believes BVF would not be an appropriate steward for all stockholders, and urges stockholders to reject the BVF proposal by voting on the WHITE proxy card AGAINST the removal of your Board.

YOUR BOARD IS COMMITTED TO CREATING WEALTH FOR ALL STOCKHOLDERS – AND IS MAKING GOOD ON THIS COMMITMENT

Your Board of Directors is committed to pursuing the strategies that are in the best interest of the majority of our stockholders and to protecting the rights of all stockholders. It is committed to finding a way to work with BVF, our largest stockholder – and has made numerous attempts to reach out to BVF and to accommodate its interests.

We believe that removing, without cause, all six of your directors – and replacing them with BVF’s nominees who lack relevant experience2 and are not independent – is not in the best interests of all of Avigen’s stockholders.

____________________
2 Based on disclosure in BVF’s proxy statement.

Your vote in this proxy contest comes down to one thing: Who can you expect to deliver, to you and all other Avigen stockholders, the full value from Avigen’s assets? We urge you to reject the BVF proposal and support your current Board of Directors, which has over the years earned your trust.

Respectfully,

Signed for the Board of Directors
Zola Horovitz, Ph.D. as Chairman of the Board
Kenneth G. Chahine, Ph.D., J.D. as Chief Executive Officer

[Full Disclosure: We have a holding in AVGN. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only.]

Read Full Post »

The New York Times has an article by Andrew Pollack, “Drug Investors Lose Patience,” about investors pushing biotechnology companies to liquidate and return capital to investors. Pollack notes that such clashes have become much more common in recent months as the stock market crash has pushed the market capitalization of many biotechnology companies to less than the cash on hand, which creates an opportunity for investors to realize an immediate return if the company dissolves. The article covers three situations that we have been following closely for several months, Avigen Inc (Nasdaq: AVGN), Neurobiological Technologies Inc (NASDAQ:NTII) and Northstar Neuroscience Inc (NASDAQ:NSTR).

The first is the clash between Avigen Inc (Nasdaq: AVGN) and Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF). We’ve been following AVGN (see archived posts here) for exactly the reason that Pollack identifies: it’s a net cash stock (i.e. it’s trading at less than the value of its cash after deducting all liabilities) and specialist biotechnology activist fund BVF has been pushing it to liquidate and return its cash to shareholders. MediciNova Inc (NASDAQ:MNOV) has made an offer for AVGN that we think represents a clever way for AVGN’s stockholders to receive cash equivalent to that which they would receive in a liquidation (less $7M to be paid to MNOV) with the possibility for “an extraordinary, uncapped return” if MNOV is successful post-merger. We estimate AVGN’s cash at around $1.22 per share (BVF estimates $1.20 per share), which is around 20% higher than AVGN’s $1.02 close yesterday.

Pollack provides a good background to the AVGN vs BVF stoush:

The Biotechnology Value Fund, often called BVF, was a longtime shareholder in Avigen. But it sold 640,000 shares, nearly all its holdings, for about $3.95 to $4.60 a share. The sale was near the stock’s highs for the year – in the two months before Avigen was scheduled to announce, in October, the clinical trial results of its drug to treat a symptom of multiple sclerosis. After the drug failed, BVF swooped in and bought more than eight million shares, nearly a 30 percent stake, at about 58 cents a share. That was well below Avigen’s cash total of about $1.90 a share at the time.

BVF has made a $1-a-share tender offer for Avigen and is trying to replace the directors. If it gains control, it could liquidate Avigen or sell it to MediciNova, which has said it wants to buy it. Mr. Chahine, the chief of Avigen, which is based in Alameda, Calif., said its assets might be parlayed into a deal that would be worth more than BVF or MediciNova would pay and more than the liquidation value. “All we’re saying is, give us an opportunity to canvass the field, see what’s out there and bring something to the shareholders,” he said.

But Mr. Nodelman said such a process might eat up the company’s remaining cash. “Someone’s got to police the space,” he said. “We’re making sure that the last $50 million in the company don’t go to the bankers and the consultants and the golden parachutes.”

BVF, which specializes in smaller biotech companies, has become the most outspoken investor pressing for its money back. The fund, based in San Francisco, gets about half of its capital from the Ziff family, which made its fortune in magazine publishing.

Mr. Nodelman makes no apologies for BVF’s having bought Avigen stock again after the collapse.

He also neatly captures the perspective of AVGN’s CEO, Ken Chahine, who, we think, speaks for on behalf of most CEOs in the same position:

“I hear that argument” about shareholder rights, said Kenneth G. Chahine, Avigen’s chief. “But it’s really ‘I want to raid the cash.’ We’re back to 1987 and ‘Barbarians at the Gate.’ “

The second situation mentioned in the article that we have been following is Neurobiological Technologies Inc (NASDAQ:NTII):

BVF is also one of four investors, which collectively own about two-thirds of the shares, demanding money back from Neurobiological Technologies of Emeryville, Calif.

The company’s stroke drug is derived from the venom of the Malayan pit viper. Three of the investors, including BVF, were shareholders when that drug failed in a clinical trial in December. The fourth bought in after the failure. The stock now trades at 58 cents, but its liquidation value would be as high as $1 a share.

Matthew Loar, the chief financial officer, said the company was sympathetic to the requests but had not yet decided what to do. In any case, he said, it could not act as fast as the investors want.

“You can’t just turn off the lights in a company in a day,” he said. Among other things, the company must figure out what to do with 1,000 poisonous snakes, he said. “We’re going to get rid of them in the most expeditious, reasonable way possible.”

We’ve been following NTII because it’s trading at a substantial discount to our estimate of its liquidating value. At its $0.59 close yesterday, NTII has a market capitalization of just $15.9M, which is around 10% higher than our $14.5M estimate for its net cash value but around two-thirds of our estimate of its $21.9M or $0.81 per share liquidation value. There exists the possibility that its liquidation value is significantly higher again if NTII receives a portion of the net proceeds paid to Celtic Pharmaceuticals upon a sale of XERECEPT. With stockholders representing 45% (note that Samuel L. Schwerin estimates 65%) of the outstanding stock of NTII calling for its liquidation, we feel the company will be under some pressure to accede and that should lead to a reasonably quick resolution.

The third situation we have been following is Northstar Neuroscience Inc (NASDAQ:NSTR), and it is particularly interesting because the company has agreed to liquidate:

Under pressure from the hedge fund RA Capital Management, for example, Northstar Neuroscience, a medical device company in Seattle whose stroke treatment failed, is proposing to liquidate, with shareholders receiving an estimated $1.90 to $2.10 a share in cash. The company’s stock, which had been as low as 90 cents in November, closed at $1.90 on Monday.

We started following NSTR because it is a net cash stock that has announced that it plans to liquidate. NSTR closed yesterday at $1.92, giving it a market capitalization of $50.2M. We originally estimated the final pay out figure in the liquidation to be around $59M or $2.26 per share, which presents an upside of around 17%. The company estimates a slightly lower pay out figure of between $1.90 and $2.10 “assuming we are unable to sell our non-cash assets” and expects to make an initial distribution within approximately 45 days after the Effective Date (which is to be announced) of approximately $1.80 per share.

The article notes that in some cases the investors asking for their money back are “not long-suffering shareholders” but “speculators who bought in only after the stock price collapsed, hoping to make a quick killing.” Aside from their characterization as “speculators,” we find ourselves in the latter camp. Our definition of investment hell is being caught in what Pollack calls a “zombie” – a company “lurching from product to product, surviving years or even decades without ever achieving success.” Finding a stock trading below a conservative estimate of the value of its assets with a good prospect that the value can be unlocked is our definition of investment heaven. Here’s to a few more quick killings, even if an investor requires the patience of Job to get them.

Hat tip to John Allen.

[Full Disclosure:  We have a holding in AVGN. We do not have a holding in NTII or NSTR. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only. Do your own research before investing in any security.]

Read Full Post »

Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF) has extended its offer to purchase all of the outstanding shares of Avigen Inc (Nasdaq: AVGN) for $1.00 per share to April 3, 2009.

We’ve been following AVGN (see archived posts here) because it’s a net cash stock (i.e. it’s trading at less than the value of its cash after deducting all liabilities) and specialist biotechnology activist fund BVF has been pushing it to liquidate and return its cash to shareholders. MediciNova Inc (NASDAQ:MNOV) has made an offer for AVGN that we think represents a clever way for AVGN’s stockholders to receive cash equivalent to that which they would receive in a liquidation (less $7M to be paid to MNOV) with the possibility for “an extraordinary, uncapped return” if MNOV is successful post-merger. We estimate AVGN’s cash at around $1.22 per share (BVF estimates $1.20 per share), which is around 20% higher than AVGN’s $1.02 close today.

BVF’s press release follows:

BVF ACQUISITION LLC EXTENDS AVIGEN TENDER OFFER TO APRIL 3, 2009

NEW YORK, March 6, 2009 – BVF Acquisition LLC (the “Purchaser”), an affiliate of Biotechnology Value Fund L.P. (“BVF”), which has commenced a cash tender offer to purchase all of the outstanding shares of Avigen, Inc. (Nasdaq: AVGN) (“Avigen”) for $1.00 per share, announced today that it has extended the expiration date for the tender offer to 6:00 p.m., New York City time, on Friday, April 3, 2009. The tender offer was previously set to expire at 6:00 p.m., New York City time, on Friday, March 6, 2009. As of the close of business on March 6, 2009, a total of 2,854,626 shares, including shares tendered by guaranteed delivery, had been tendered in and not withdrawn from the offer, which together with the shares owned by BVF and affiliates, represents approximately 39.2% of the total shares outstanding of Avigen.

[Full Disclosure: We have a holding in AVGN. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only.]

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »