|ABTL||Autobytel Inc||Trilogy Enterprises|
|AMLN||Amylin Pharmaceuticals||Carl Icahn|
|ASPM||Aspect Medical Systems||First Manhattan Co|
|ASUR||Asure Software Inc||Red Oak Partners|
|BASI||Bioanalytical Systems||Peter Kissinger|
|BBEP||BreitBurn Energy Partners, L.P.||Baupost Group|
|BCSB||BCSB Bancorp Inc.||Financial Edge Fund|
|CHE||Chemed Corp [Download an In-Depth Analysis from Catalyst Investment Research]
|CHG||CH Energy Group Inc||GAMCO Investors|
|CHIC||Charlotte Russe Holding Inc||KarpReilly Capital Management|
|CLHI.PK||CLST Holdings||Red Oak Partners|
|COHM.PK||Coachmen Industries||Gamco Investors|
|CPY||CPI Corp||Ramius Capital|
|CWLZ||Cowlitz Bancorporation||Crescent Capital|
|DAVE||Famous Daves of America||Vicuna Advisors|
|DCS||Dreman/Claymore Dividend & Income Fund||Bulldog Investors|
|DFZ||R.G. Barry||Mill Road Capital|
|ENTU||Entrust Inc.||Empire Capital|
|ENZN||Enzon Pharmaceuticals Inc.||DellaCamera Capital Management|
|FACT||Facet Biotech Corporation||Baupost Group|
|FBSS||Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.||William Sudduth|
|FPU||Florida Public Utilities Companyu||Energy West|
|FSS||Federal Signal||Warren Kanders|
|GAIA||Gaiam Inc||Mill Road Capital|
|GEYH.OB||Global Employment Holdings||Victory Park Capital|
|GSIG||GSI Group||Stephen Bershad|
|GSLA||GS Financial Corp||Riggs Qualified Partners|
|HAR||Harman International Industries||Relational Investors|
|IPAS||iPass Inc||Foxhill Capital|
|IPAS||iPass Inc||Ramius Capital|
|KFS||Kingsway Financial Services Inc||Joseph Stilwell|
|KONA||Kona Grill||Mill Road Capital|
|MCGC||MCG Capital||Springbok Capital Management|
|MEG||Media General||GAMCO Investors|
|MLVF||Malvern Federal Bancorp||Joseph Stillwell|
|NDD||Neuberger Berman Dividend Advantage Fund||Bulldog Investor|
|NMTI||NMT Medical||Glenhill Advisors|
|NTN||NTN Buzztime, Inc.||Trinad Capital Master Fund|
|OFIX||Orthofix International||Ramius Capital|
|OICO||OI Corp||Mustang Capital Management|
|PIF||Insured Municipal Income Fund Inc||Bulldog Investors|
|PLCE||The Childrens Place Retail Stores, Inc.||Ezra Dabah|
|PWER||Power One||Bel Fuse|
|ROY||International Royalty Corp||Coordinates Capital Corp|
|RPT||Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust||Equity One|
|SAH||Sonic Automotive||Paul Rusnak|
|STRM||Streamline Health Solutions||Eric Lombardo|
|SUMT||SumTotal Systems||Vista Equity Partners|
|SUMT||SumTotal Systems||Discovery Capital|
|TDS||Telephone & Data Systems||GAMCO Investors|
|TDS||Telephone & Data Systems||Southeastern Asset Management|
|TLGD||Tollgrade Communications Inc||Ramius Capital Group|
|TMENE.OB||Thermoenergy Corp||Quercus Trust|
|TMI||TM Entertainment & Media Inc||Bulldog Investors|
|TTSP||TransTech Services Partners||Bulldog Investors|
|ULU||Uluru Inc.||Brencourt Advisors|
|VSNT||Versant Corp||Discovery Capital|
|WOC||Wilshire Enterprises||Bulldog Investors|
|WOLF||Great Wolf Resorts||Hovde Capital Advisors|
Archive for May, 2009
Gretchen Morgenson of The NYTimes reports in Elect a Dissident, and You May Win a Prize that a new study of 120 “hybrid” boards (those formed when activist shareholders won one or more director seats) from 2005 through 2008 found that, on average, these companies’ shares outperformed their peers in both the short and long-term. The study was conducted by the Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute, a nonprofit organization, and Proxy Governance, a proxy advisory firm.
The results are compelling:
From the beginning of the contest period for a board seat through the first year of a hybrid board’s existence, companies’ total returns were 19.1 percent, or 16.6 percentage points better than peers’. And total share price performance through the three-year anniversary of the hybrid boards averaged 21.5 percent, almost 18 percentage points more than their peers.
According to Morgenson, much of the excess return occurs shortly after an activist announces his or her intention to seek board seats:
Investors, taking their cue that the company may be undervalued, typically bid up its shares in the three months leading up to the formation of a hybrid board. Keep in mind, too, that averages mask both exceptional and disastrous outcomes.
The size of the stake held by the dissident shareholder affects results: The bigger the shareholding, the bigger the gains:
At companies at which dissidents held 5 to 10 percent of shares, for instance, results over the following 15 months moderately exceeded those of their peer groups. But for companies in which the dissidents owned 10 percent to one-quarter of the stock, price appreciation significantly outshone peers, averaging almost 68 percentage points higher over the ensuing 15 months.
Performance at the companies where dissidents held less than 5 percent of shares was only in line with peers, on average.
Says Jon Lukomnik, director of the Investor Responsibility Research Center:
I think what it says is there is some value to owners being able to challenge existing management and that there are also some limits to that value.
The study is timely, coinciding with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s consideration of steps to make it easier for investors to nominate alternative directors to corporate boards.
Lamassu Holdings LLC has nominated two director candidates for election to the Ditech Networks Inc (NASDAQ:DITC) board of directors at the DITC annual meeting.
We’ve been following DITC (see our archive here) because it is trading below its net cash value with an investor, Lamassu Holdings LLC, disclosing a 9.4% holding in November last year. Lamassu has previously offered to acquire DITC for $1.25 per share in cash. Lamassu says that it “anticipates its due diligence requirement will take no more than two weeks and there is no financing contingency.” Lamassu has now nominated two candidates for election to the board “who are committed to enhancing shareholder value through a review of the Company’s business and strategic direction.” The stock is up 16.8% from $0.89 to close yesterday at $1.04, giving the company a market capitalization of $27.3M. We last estimated the net cash value to be $34.3M or $1.31 per share.
Lamassu Holdings L.L.C. Discloses Nomination of Two Highly Qualified Director Candidates for Election to the Ditech Networks Board of Directors at the 2009 Annual Meeting
NEWPORT BEACH, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Lamassu Holdings L.L.C. (“Lamassu”) announced today that it has nominated two highly qualified director nominees for election to the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Ditech Networks, Inc. (the “Company” or “DITC”) (Nasdaq:DITC) to replace two directors whose terms are up for election at the Company’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). Lamassu, which beneficially owns an aggregate of 2,399,845 shares, or approximately 9.1% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, delivered written notice today of its nominations to the Corporate Secretary of the Company in accordance with the Company’s bylaws.
Tim Leehealey, managing member of Lamassu and one of Lamassu’s director nominees, stated, “After repeated attempts to engage in a constructive dialogue were ignored by the incumbent Board and AccessData’s interest in purchasing the Company at a significant premium was rejected without any discussions with the potential bidder, we have come to the conclusion that new leadership on the Board is needed to maximize stockholder value, which we believe has suffered significant deterioration at the hands of the current Board.”
Mr. Leehealey continued, “We believe the current regime has a strong track record of failure in allocating the Company’s capital. Whether embarking on organic product development or growth through acquisition, this Board has failed to diversify outside of its core echo cancellation product line. We believe all significant efforts to diversify, including its Titanium systems, the Packet Voice Processor platform and acquisition of Jasomi Networks, Inc., have cost the company well over $100 million in capital and, quite possibly, closer to $200 million, even as the Company generated significant cash from its core echo business. Now the Company is faced with reinventing its business and it appears the current Board, which has failed miserably in its prior attempts to do so, believes that stockholders want a course of action that includes internally pursing another high-risk product strategy as well as pursuing acquisition opportunities.”
Mr. Leehealey concluded, “We are fearful that stockholder equity will continue to erode at the Company unless substantial changes are made. To this end we are nominating two highly qualified directors who are committed to enhancing shareholder value through a review of the Company’s business and strategic direction. If elected, our nominees intend to work constructively with the remaining Board members, as well as with the Company’s management team, to determine the best course of action for stockholders. Our nominees intend to conduct a strategic review of all options for the Company, including a possible sale or liquidation, that will improve stockholder value without taking undo risk that could jeopardize the remaining value inherent in the Company’s balance sheet, something we believe this Board has failed to accomplish.”
Stockholders can refer to Lamassu’s previous SEC filings for additional information.
The Company currently has a total of seven directors. Lamassu is seeking to replace two incumbent directors whose terms of office expire at the Annual Meeting.
Lamassu’s two independent director nominees will bring substantial business leadership and corporate governance expertise to the Company’s Board. The nominees are:
* Tim Leehealey. Mr. Leehealey is the co-founder and managing member of Lamassu Holdings L.L.C., a holding company specializing in taking an active role in small technology and alternative energy investments. In addition to his position with Lamassu, Mr. Leehealey is CEO of AccessData, a Lamassu company and provider of investigative software focused in the areas of forensics, eDiscovery, and incident response. Mr. Leehealey joined AccessData in August of 2007 and under his leadership has more than doubled the size of the company and established it as one of the leading providers in its market. Prior to joining AccessData, Mr. Leehealey was with Guidance Software for four years, as the Vice President of Corporate Development, and played a key role in taking that company public in 2006. In addition to his work at Guidance Software and AccessData, Mr Leehealey spent approximately 10 years working as an equity analyst covering security and networking companies. Mr. Leehealey holds a degree in computer science and economics from Stanford University.
* Frank J. Sansone. Mr. Sansone has over 15 years of financial management and technology experience with a focus on managing all the financial elements of small fast growing public and private technology companies. Most recently Mr. Sansone served as CFO for LiveOffice, a rapidly growing SAAS email archiving software & services company with annual revenues of approximately $25 million with 96% annual bookings growth and 100+ employees. Prior to his involvement with LiveOffice Mr. Sansone served as the CFO of Guidance Software were he not only was instrumental in helping to deliver over 5 years of 40%+ growth but he also oversaw all the key financial aspects associated with taking the company public. Before joining Guidance Software Mr. Sansone accumulated approximately 10 years of financial experience including working for five years as a Audit Manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Sansone is a CPA in good standing with both the California Society of Certified Public Accountants as well as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
[Full Disclosure: We do not have a holding in DITC. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only. Do your own research before investing in any security.]
Posted in Activist Investors, Net Cash Stocks, Northstar Neuroscience Inc (NASDAQ:NSTR), Stocks, tagged Activist investment, Liquidation Value, Northstar Neuroscience Inc (NASDAQ:NSTR) on May 26, 2009 | 4 Comments »
The shareholders of Northstar Neuroscience Inc (NASDAQ:NSTR) have approved the complete liquidation of NSTR at a special meeting of shareholders.
We started following NSTR because it was a net cash stock that has announced that it plans to liquidate. NSTR closed Friday at $1.97, giving it a market capitalization of $48.4M. We originally estimated the final pay out figure in the liquidation to be around $59M or $2.26 per share, which presents an upside of around 25%. The company estimates a slightly lower pay out figure of between $1.90 and $2.10 “assuming we are unable to sell our non-cash assets” and expects to make an initial distribution within approximately 45 days after the Effective Date (which is to be announced) of approximately $1.80 per share.
The company’s announcement is as follows:
On May 14, 2009, Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. (the “Company”) held a special meeting of shareholders, at which the shareholders of the Company approved the voluntary dissolution and liquidation of the Company pursuant to a Plan of Complete Liquidation and Dissolution (the “Plan”). Pursuant to the Plan, the Company intends to file articles of dissolution (the “Articles”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Washington as soon as reasonably practicable after resolution of the audit of the Company’s State of Washington tax obligations and receipt of the required revenue clearance certificate from the Department of Revenue of the State of Washington. The Company will be dissolved upon the effective date of the Articles (the “Effective Date”), which may be the date on which the Articles are filed or a later date specified in the Articles. The Company intends to make a public announcement in advance of the anticipated Effective Date and to delist its Common Stock from the Nasdaq Global Market as of the Effective Date.
Pursuant to the Plan, the Company is also authorized to dispose of its remaining non-cash assets, on such terms and at such prices as the Company’s board of directors, without further shareholder approval, may determine to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, to pay or make reasonable provision to pay all claims against and obligations of the Company, to make such provisions as will be reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide compensation for any claim against the Company which is the subject of a pending action, suit or proceeding to which the Company is a party, to distribute on a pro rata basis to the shareholders of the Company the remaining assets of the Company, and, subject to statutory limitations, to take all other actions necessary to wind up and liquidate the Company’s business and affairs.
[Full Disclosure: We do not have a holding in NSTR. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only. Do your own research before investing in any security.]
We’re taking a break for the Memorial Day holiday. Have a great long weekend.
Posted in Activist Investors, Avigen (NASDAQ:AVGN), Biotechnology Value Fund, Stocks, tagged Activist investment, Avigen Inc (NASDAQ:AVGN), Biotechnology Value Fund, Liquidation Value on May 22, 2009 | 2 Comments »
Avigen Inc (NASDAQ:AVGN) has been granted a United States Patent for the treatment of neuropathic pain with its AV411 (ibudilast) compound.
We started following AVGN in December last year (see archived posts here) because it was a net cash stock (i.e. it was trading at less than the value of its cash after deducting all liabilities), albeit a cash burning net cash stock, and specialist biotechnology investor Biotechnology Value Fund (BVF) was pushing it to liquidate and return its cash to shareholders. Despite BVF’s failure to remove the board, we continued to maintain our position in AVGN because BVF won a number of important concessions from the board that made AVGN a much more attractive stock than it was when we started following it. The stock price reflects this: AVGN is up 94% from $0.65 when we initiated the position to close yesterday at $1.26. We’ve reduced our estimate of the net cash slightly to $34M or $1.14 per share. We believe that the there is a good chance that AVGN will yield considerably more than its net cash value. The net cash estimate does not take into account AVGN’s AV411 assets and program or near term payments from Genzyme, which could be worth as much as $6M to $25M or between $0.18 or $0.75 per share more.
The announcement from the company is as follows:
Avigen Granted AV411 Patent for Neuropathic Pain
ALAMEDA, Calif., May 20, 2009 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Avigen, Inc. (Nasdaq:AVGN) a biopharmaceutical company, announced today that it has been granted United States Patent No. 7,534,806, entitled “Method for Treating Neuropathic Pain and Associated Syndromes.” The patent covers the treatment of neuropathic pain with therapeutic doses of AV411 (ibudilast), including syndromes like diabetic neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, and fibromyalgia, and neuropathic pain associated with stroke or accompanying cancer chemotherapy. Avigen anticipates additional patents will be issued covering indications that include addiction, delirium, and psychotic disorders, as well as composition of matter claims on AV411 analogs. AV411 is marketed in Japan but not approved for any indication in the United States.
“This patent is a critical first step to securing broad exclusivity for AV411 and analogs in the key markets of neuropathic pain and addiction,” commented Andrew Sauter, Avigen’s Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer. “We are currently seeking to monetize our AV411 drug development portfolio and believe the issuance of this patent, along with our active U.S. IND and Phase 2-staged data package, enhances the value proposition to potential buyers.”
“This is a significant accomplishment that reflects Avigen’s strategic efforts to identify novel mechanisms to treat neurologic disorders and to protect the know-how and intellectual property of our scientific discoveries,” stated Kirk Johnson, Ph.D., Vice President of Research and Development at Avigen. “Our intellectual property portfolio is advancing in parallel with our AV411 development efforts for pain states and certain drug addiction conditions, thus creating a cohesive program.”
Avigen discovered the utility of AV411 through its internal program to develop innovative and targeted approaches to reducing nervous system dysfunction caused by glial cell activation. Avigen was issued the new patent after demonstrating that AV411 effectively and safely treated neuropathic pain in well-recognized, standard preclinical animal models. The claims broadly cover the treatment of neuropathic pain, and make specific reference to using AV411 to treat many forms of neuropathic pain including diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, trigeminal neuralgia, HIV, stroke, fibromyalgia, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, complex regional pain syndrome, spinal cord injury, sciatica, phantom limb pain, and cancer chemotherapeutic-induced neuropathic pain.
AVGN’s board is developing a plan of liquidation, which should put a floor on AVGN’s stock at around its net cash value of $34M or $1.14 per share less wind down costs. There exists a good chance that AVGN will yield considerably more than its net cash value. The net cash estimate does not take into account AVGN’s AV411 technology or near term payments from Genzyme, which could be worth as much as $6M to $25M or between $0.18 or $0.75 per share more. With the downside protected, and a good chance at a substantial $0.75 per share upside from here, we think AVGN still represents good value, and we’re going to maintain our position accordingly.
[Full Disclosure: We have a holding in AVGN. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only. Do your own research before investing in any security.]
Posted in Activist Investors, MathStar Inc (OTC:MATH), Net Cash Stocks, Stocks, tagged Activist investment, Liquidation Value, MathStar Inc (OTC:MATH), Net Cash Stock on May 21, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
MathStar Inc’s (OTC:MATH) board has rejected the $1.04 per share cash merger offer from PureChoice, Inc. because “the $1.04 per share price is less than the liquidation value of MathStar, including the value from any technology sale, and, in the Merger, MathStar’s shareholders would derive no value from MathStar’s net operating loss carryforwards.”
We’ve been following MATH since December last year (see our post archive here) when it was trading at $0.68. We initiated the position because MATH was trading below its net cash value and had two substantial stockholders lobbying management to liquidate. The stock is up 48.5% to $1.01 yesterday, giving it a market capitalization of $9.3M. We estimate MATH’s liquidation value to be around $12.0M or $1.31 per share. That value is predominantly cash and short term investments and doesn’t take into account any further value that the sale of the FPOA technology and intellectual property may yield. The two activist investors, Mr. Zachary McAdoo of The Zanett Group and Mr. Salvatore Muoio of S. Muoio & Co., have been urging MATH’s board to consider liquidation rather than a merger. MATH’s board seems to agree, twice rejecting PureChoice, Inc’s previous unsolicited merger proposals and now rejecting PureChoice, Inc for a third time, suspending the company’s operations and exploring “strategic alternatives, which could include merger, acquisition, increasing operations in another structure or liquidation.”
The press release from MATH is below:
On May 11, 2009, MathStar, Inc. received a letter containing an unsolicited proposal by PureChoice, Inc. (“PCI”) to enter into a merger transaction with MathStar (the “Merger”). As proposed by PCI, MathStar’s stockholders would receive cash consideration of $1.04 per share in the Merger for all of their MathStar shares.
MathStar’s Board considered and analyzed PCI’s Merger proposal. It concluded that PCI’s proposal was not acceptable because, among other reasons, the $1.04 per share price is less than the liquidation value of MathStar, including the value from any technology sale, and, in the Merger, MathStar’s shareholders would derive no value from MathStar’s net operating loss carryforwards. Thus, the Board rejected PCI’s Merger proposal as not being in the best interests of MathStar’s stockholders. The Board will continue to pursue strategic alternatives.
We said on the filing of the letter to MATH that we thought that, to be successful, any merger offer would, at the minimum, need to be pitched at MATH’s liquidation value (which we estimated at $12.0M or $1.31 per share). Hopefully PureChoice, Inc. will return with a genuine bid that reflects this value.
[Full Disclosure: We do not have a holding in MATH. This is neither a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. All information provided believed to be reliable and presented for information purposes only. Do your own research before investing in any security.]