<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iconic Value vs Glamour research receives an update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/</link>
	<description>Deep value, contrarian, and activist value investment strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 15:12:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Which price ratio best identifies value stocks? &#171; Greenbackd</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/#comment-8234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Which price ratio best identifies value stocks? &#171; Greenbackd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2680#comment-8234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Investment, Extrapolation and Risk, which was updated by The Brandes Institute as Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon reopened the debate, suggesting that price-to-earnings and price-to-cash flow might add something [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Investment, Extrapolation and Risk, which was updated by The Brandes Institute as Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon reopened the debate, suggesting that price-to-earnings and price-to-cash flow might add something [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A tide in the affairs of men &#171; Greenbackd</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/#comment-3555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A tide in the affairs of men &#171; Greenbackd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2680#comment-3555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] believe value works. The various academic studies that I&#8217;m so fond of quoting (for example, Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon and Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk) confirm for me that value is a real [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] believe value works. The various academic studies that I&#8217;m so fond of quoting (for example, Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon and Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk) confirm for me that value is a real [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admiration a contrarian indicator &#171; Greenbackd</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admiration a contrarian indicator &#171; Greenbackd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2680#comment-3009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Vishny in Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (and the The Brandes Institute update Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon. Those two papers found that value stocks (defined as the lowest decile of stocks by [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vishny in Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (and the The Brandes Institute update Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon. Those two papers found that value stocks (defined as the lowest decile of stocks by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Near Graham net nets vs Ultra-low price-to-book value stocks &#171; Greenbackd</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Near Graham net nets vs Ultra-low price-to-book value stocks &#171; Greenbackd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2680#comment-2769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) as updated by The Brandes Institute’s Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008) speak to the return on the Ultra-low Price-to-book Portfolio. One wrinkle in that theory is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) as updated by The Brandes Institute’s Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008) speak to the return on the Ultra-low Price-to-book Portfolio. One wrinkle in that theory is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A closer look at the &#8220;High Minus Low&#8221; strategy: Component returns (Part 1) &#171; Greenbackd</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/#comment-2734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A closer look at the &#8220;High Minus Low&#8221; strategy: Component returns (Part 1) &#171; Greenbackd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2680#comment-2734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) as updated by The Brandes Institute’s Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008) &#8211; but it is most closely associated with Fama and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) as updated by The Brandes Institute’s Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008) &#8211; but it is most closely associated with Fama and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piotroski&#8217;s F_SCORE in practice &#171; Greenbackd</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/#comment-2656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piotroski&#8217;s F_SCORE in practice &#171; Greenbackd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2680#comment-2656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Robert Vishny Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) and The Brandes Institute’s Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008) - low price-to-book value stocks outperform higher priced stocks and the market in general. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robert Vishny Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) and The Brandes Institute’s Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008) - low price-to-book value stocks outperform higher priced stocks and the market in general. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testing the performance of price-to-book value &#171; Greenbackd</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Testing the performance of price-to-book value &#171; Greenbackd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2680#comment-2508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] H. Thaler&#8217;s Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality (1987). In Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon, The Brandes Institute updated the landmark 1994 study by Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] H. Thaler&#8217;s Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality (1987). In Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon, The Brandes Institute updated the landmark 1994 study by Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Counterintuition &#171; Greenbackd</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Counterintuition &#171; Greenbackd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2680#comment-2421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] strategy. Glamour feels like a better bet than value, but studies have shown over and over again that value outperforms glamour or momentum. Tangible asset value &#8211; liquidation value [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] strategy. Glamour feels like a better bet than value, but studies have shown over and over again that value outperforms glamour or momentum. Tangible asset value &#8211; liquidation value [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plumbing the depths with Wolseley : Interactive Investor Blog</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plumbing the depths with Wolseley : Interactive Investor Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2680#comment-2206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] According to new research by the Brandes Institute, value still beats growth by a large margin [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to new research by the Brandes Institute, value still beats growth by a large margin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beneteau</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/23/iconic-value-vs-glamour-research-receives-an-update/#comment-2193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beneteau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2680#comment-2193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for sharing the article.

so the presumption is value = low P/B.

but is B adjusted? and do you have any past work on using p/b in screening for stocks?

thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for sharing the article.</p>
<p>so the presumption is value = low P/B.</p>
<p>but is B adjusted? and do you have any past work on using p/b in screening for stocks?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

