<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value investors for change nominates directors to board of MRV Communications Inc (OTC:MRVC)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/08/value-investors-for-change-nominates-directors-to-board-of-mrv-communications-inc-otcmrvc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/08/value-investors-for-change-nominates-directors-to-board-of-mrv-communications-inc-otcmrvc/</link>
	<description>Identifying undervalued activist situations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRV Communications About to Change? &#171; TrashStock</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/08/value-investors-for-change-nominates-directors-to-board-of-mrv-communications-inc-otcmrvc/#comment-2058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MRV Communications About to Change? &#171; TrashStock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2560#comment-2058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] blog GREENBACKD I posted the following comment in response to their bullish post, in which they like VIFC&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog GREENBACKD I posted the following comment in response to their bullish post, in which they like VIFC&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://greenbackd.com/2009/10/08/value-investors-for-change-nominates-directors-to-board-of-mrv-communications-inc-otcmrvc/#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbackd.com/?p=2560#comment-2057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a long-time investor in MRVC, my only concern is this: according to SEC documents, VIFC collectively holds only 1.9 millions shares, or about 1.2% of outstanding [http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/887969/000110465909058845/a09-31532_18k.htm].  I&#039;d feel more comfortable having a fellow investor like Dr. Shubin Stein insert himself onto a public company&#039;s board if he and/or his war party held at least 5%.  They seem to have put a huge amount of work into attempting to change a company in which they have a seemingly very small position. As you pointed out, MRVC&#039;s sales are &gt; $500M ($538M in 2008 according to recent 10K filing); at $147M market cap, Value Investors for Change stands to reap quite a profit (depending on when they invested, of course) if the current share price goes to just $2/sh.  I&#039;d feel more comfortable, though, if I knew that their interest in this penny stock was somewhat more sizeable.  Also I&#039;d feel more comfortable if they weren&#039;t attempting to appoint a bunch of self-described &quot;value&quot; investors to a board that perhaps needs CEO&#039;s of other publicly traded network-infrastructure companies.

..alex.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long-time investor in MRVC, my only concern is this: according to SEC documents, VIFC collectively holds only 1.9 millions shares, or about 1.2% of outstanding [http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/887969/000110465909058845/a09-31532_18k.htm].  I&#8217;d feel more comfortable having a fellow investor like Dr. Shubin Stein insert himself onto a public company&#8217;s board if he and/or his war party held at least 5%.  They seem to have put a huge amount of work into attempting to change a company in which they have a seemingly very small position. As you pointed out, MRVC&#8217;s sales are &gt; $500M ($538M in 2008 according to recent 10K filing); at $147M market cap, Value Investors for Change stands to reap quite a profit (depending on when they invested, of course) if the current share price goes to just $2/sh.  I&#8217;d feel more comfortable, though, if I knew that their interest in this penny stock was somewhat more sizeable.  Also I&#8217;d feel more comfortable if they weren&#8217;t attempting to appoint a bunch of self-described &#8220;value&#8221; investors to a board that perhaps needs CEO&#8217;s of other publicly traded network-infrastructure companies.</p>
<p>..alex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

